📖 Overview
Moral Dimensions examines three key aspects of moral judgment: permissibility, meaning, and blame. T.M. Scanlon breaks down these interconnected concepts and challenges traditional philosophical views about intention and moral assessment.
Through detailed analysis and examples, Scanlon demonstrates how judgments of permissibility differ from evaluations of meaning in actions. The book presents a framework for understanding how intentions relate to the moral status of actions, while questioning common assumptions about the role of consequences.
The final section develops a new theory of blame that connects it to relationships and moral expectations rather than desert or consequences. Scanlon outlines how blame functions in moral life and what makes someone genuinely blameworthy.
The work contributes to ongoing debates about moral responsibility and agency, while offering insights into how humans navigate complex ethical terrain. Its systematic approach to understanding moral judgment has implications for both philosophical theory and practical ethics.
👀 Reviews
Readers report this text is dense and requires concentration, with many spending weeks working through the arguments. On philosophy discussion forums, readers highlight Scanlon's detailed treatment of intention and its role in moral evaluation.
Appreciated aspects:
- Clear breakdown of moral responsibility vs blame
- Strong examples that illustrate complex concepts
- Thorough engagement with opposing viewpoints
- Quality of argumentation in Chapters 1-2
Common criticisms:
- Writing style can be repetitive
- Some passages need multiple readings to grasp
- Chapter 4 feels less developed than earlier chapters
- Limited practical applications of the theory
Ratings:
Goodreads: 4.14/5 (37 ratings)
Amazon: 4.3/5 (6 reviews)
One philosophy graduate student noted: "Scanlon's analysis of the meaning-intention relationship is precise but requires serious concentration to follow." Another reviewer said: "The examples help but this is not casual reading - expect to work through arguments slowly."
📚 Similar books
What We Owe to Each Other by T.M. Scanlon
The book examines contractualist moral theory and the foundations of right and wrong through systematic philosophical analysis.
Ethics in the Real World by Peter Singer The text connects abstract moral theory to concrete ethical problems in society through philosophical reasoning.
The Right and the Good by W. D. Ross This work establishes a framework for understanding moral duties and their relationships to consequences and intentions.
Morality and Action by Warren Quinn The book explores the connection between moral philosophy and human agency through examination of practical reason.
Practical Ethics by James Rachels The work bridges theoretical moral philosophy with applied ethics through analysis of real-world moral problems.
Ethics in the Real World by Peter Singer The text connects abstract moral theory to concrete ethical problems in society through philosophical reasoning.
The Right and the Good by W. D. Ross This work establishes a framework for understanding moral duties and their relationships to consequences and intentions.
Morality and Action by Warren Quinn The book explores the connection between moral philosophy and human agency through examination of practical reason.
Practical Ethics by James Rachels The work bridges theoretical moral philosophy with applied ethics through analysis of real-world moral problems.
🤔 Interesting facts
🔹 The author, T.M. Scanlon, developed what's known as "contractualism" in moral philosophy - the idea that moral rightness depends on principles that no one could reasonably reject.
🔹 This book (published in 2008) marks a significant shift from Scanlon's earlier focus on the permissibility of actions to exploring the deeper meanings behind our intentions and moral blame.
🔹 The work challenges the widely held "doctrine of double effect" - the principle that it's sometimes permissible to cause harm as a side effect but not as an intended consequence.
🔹 Scanlon was greatly influenced by John Rawls at Harvard, where they were colleagues, and later went on to hold Rawls' former position as the Alford Professor of Natural Religion, Moral Philosophy, and Civil Polity.
🔹 The book's discussion of blame has been particularly influential, as it reconceptualizes blame not as a negative emotion or desire for revenge, but as a modification of our relationships with others based on their conduct.