Book

Science, Democracy, and the American University

📖 Overview

Science, Democracy, and the American University examines how progressive intellectuals in the early 20th century sought to remake American democracy through science education and research. The book focuses on academics and reformers who believed scientific thinking could transform citizens and create a more rational society. The narrative traces efforts at major universities to establish new approaches to teaching and research that would cultivate scientific habits of mind among students. Key figures including John Dewey and Charles Horton Cooley worked to integrate scientific methods into fields like sociology, psychology, and economics. Through analysis of academic writings, institutional records, and public discourse, the book reconstructs debates about science's role in American life between 1880-1940. The reforms and arguments of this period shaped modern research universities and influenced how Americans viewed the relationship between science and democracy. This intellectual history reveals tensions between competing visions of science as either a technical enterprise or a broader mode of thought that could guide social progress. The book raises enduring questions about expertise, citizenship, and the goals of higher education in a democratic society.

👀 Reviews

Readers note this is a dense academic text focused on the development of scientific democracy in American universities. Several reviewers mention its value as a research resource while acknowledging it can be challenging to get through. What readers liked: - Detailed historical research and documentation - Clear connections between science education and democratic ideals - Thorough examination of key historical figures and institutions What readers disliked: - Writing style described as "dry" and "repetitive" - Some sections bog down in excessive detail - Limited accessibility for general readers Ratings: Goodreads: 4.0/5 (5 ratings) Amazon: 5/5 (1 rating) From a reader on Academia.edu: "Jewett's archival work is impressive but the prose makes it difficult to extract the key arguments." Note: This book has limited reviews online, likely due to its specialized academic nature. Most discussion appears in academic journals rather than consumer review sites.

📚 Similar books

The Scientific Life by Steven Shapin This history examines how American scientists transformed from independent truth-seekers to corporate researchers in the twentieth century.

Science for All by John Rudolph This book traces the development of American science education and its connection to democracy from 1850 to 1900.

The Politics of Pure Science by Daniel S. Greenberg The text analyzes the relationship between American scientific research and government funding during the Cold War period.

Objectivity by Lorraine Daston, Peter Galison This work explores how scientific objectivity emerged as an ideal and shaped knowledge production in American universities.

Universities in the Age of Corporate Science by Jennifer Washburn The book documents the transformation of American university research under the influence of corporate partnerships and market forces.

🤔 Interesting facts

🎓 Andrew Jewett is an Associate Professor at Harvard University who specializes in U.S. intellectual and cultural history, with particular focus on the relationship between science and democracy. 📚 The book examines how American social scientists and intellectuals between 1880-1940 tried to use science as a tool to create moral and civic transformation in society. 🔬 The term "scientific democracy" emerged during this period, representing the belief that scientific knowledge could help create better citizens and strengthen democratic institutions. 🏛️ The work reveals how Progressive Era universities became central battlegrounds for competing visions of how science could shape American democracy and moral values. 📖 This book won the 2013 David H. Pinkney Prize from the Society for French Historical Studies, despite focusing on American history, highlighting its significant contribution to understanding the broader relationship between science and society.