Against Absolute Goodness

Against Absolute Goodness presents Richard Kraut's philosophical argument challenging the concept of absolute, non-relative goodness. The book examines traditional philosophical assumptions about intrinsic value and questions whether "good" can exist as a property independent of any benefits to living beings. Kraut systematically analyzes major philosophical works and arguments supporting the existence of absolute goodness, from Plato through contemporary thinkers. His analysis draws on both classical philosophical methods and practical examples to build his case for a purely relational theory of goodness. Through a series of linked arguments, the book develops an alternative framework for understanding goodness and value based entirely on relationships between things that are good or bad for specific beings. The text engages with potential counterarguments while maintaining focus on its central thesis. This work represents a fundamental challenge to centuries of ethical philosophy and suggests new ways to think about the nature of value, morality, and human flourishing. Its implications extend beyond pure philosophy into practical ethics and how we conceive of the good life.

Readers describe this philosophical text as dense but rewarding. Reviews highlight Kraut's clear argumentation against the existence of absolute goodness and his examples that demonstrate how goodness is always relative to specific beings. Positive comments focus on: - Methodical breakdown of complex philosophical concepts - Strong engagement with opposing viewpoints - Practical applications and real-world examples - Clear writing style relative to similar academic works Common criticisms include: - Repetitive examples and arguments - Limited discussion of alternative theories of value - Technical language that can be difficult for non-philosophers Ratings: Goodreads: 3.67/5 (9 ratings) Amazon: 4.5/5 (4 ratings) Google Books: 4/5 (2 ratings) One philosophy professor's review noted: "Kraut effectively dismantles the notion of absolute goodness, though the implications could be explored further." A graduate student wrote: "The prose is precise but requires careful reading - this isn't casual philosophy."

The Right and the Good by W. D. Ross This philosophical work examines the nature of moral rightness and goodness through a systematic framework of prima facie duties.

Sources of Normativity by Christine Korsgaard The text investigates the foundations of moral obligations and questions why humans should accept the demands of morality.

On What Matters by Derek Parfit This comprehensive examination of moral philosophy explores the nature of reasons, rationality, and the relationship between objective truth and moral claims.

The Sovereignty of Good by Iris Murdoch The work challenges modern moral philosophy by exploring the connection between goodness, truth, and human consciousness.

Creating the Kingdom of Ends by Christine Korsgaard The book presents a systematic interpretation of Kant's moral theory while addressing fundamental questions about value and moral obligation.

🔸 The book challenges a 2,500-year-old philosophical tradition by arguing against the existence of absolute goodness, suggesting instead that all goodness must be relative to something or someone. 🔸 Author Richard Kraut is a professor at Northwestern University and has written extensively about Aristotle, including the acclaimed "Aristotle on the Human Good" and "What is Good and Why." 🔸 The work builds on ideas from philosophers like Peter Geach, who argued in 1956 that 'good' is always an attributive adjective (like 'tall') rather than a predicative one (like 'red'). 🔸 The book's argument has significant implications for how we think about ethics and morality, suggesting that phrases like "the highest good" or "absolutely good" are fundamentally meaningless. 🔸 Despite challenging traditional views of goodness, Kraut maintains that we can still make meaningful ethical judgments and assessments about what is good for particular beings or purposes.