📖 Overview
The Law of Obscenity analyzes legal approaches to regulating sexually explicit material and defines what constitutes "obscenity" under U.S. law. Frederick Schauer examines Supreme Court decisions and the evolution of obscenity standards from the early 20th century through modern times.
The book explores constitutional issues around free speech and the First Amendment as they relate to obscene materials. It covers landmark cases like Miller v. California and tracks shifting societal views on censorship and pornography regulation.
The text includes examination of philosophical arguments for and against obscenity laws, as well as practical challenges in their enforcement. Schauer addresses questions about harm, community standards, artistic merit, and changing technology.
This work remains a key reference on the intersection of law, morality, and freedom of expression. The analysis raises fundamental questions about the role of government in regulating private behavior and speech.
👀 Reviews
This appears to be a specialized legal text that has limited public reviews available online. The book is cited in academic papers and court decisions but lacks reader reviews on major platforms like Goodreads, Amazon, or Google Books.
Based on academic citations and legal references, readers value:
- Analysis of First Amendment doctrine related to obscenity
- Historical context of obscenity laws
- Discussion of constitutional theory
Critical mentions note:
- Dense academic writing style
- Dated examples (published 1976)
- Focus on US law rather than international perspectives
No public ratings or reviews found on:
- Goodreads
- Amazon
- Barnes & Noble
- LibraryThing
The book appears to be primarily used in academic law settings rather than by general readers, which explains the lack of public reviews.
Note: This is a limited assessment based on available information. The book may have reviews in legal journals or academic publications not readily accessible online.
📚 Similar books
Free Speech by Eric Barendt
An examination of constitutional rights, legal precedents, and philosophical foundations that shape freedom of expression in modern democracies.
Speech Wars by Dennis Donoghue A study of censorship battles, court cases, and social debates about the boundaries between protected speech and restricted content.
The First Amendment by Daniel Farber The text traces the evolution of First Amendment interpretations through Supreme Court decisions and changing social standards.
Censorship and Silencing by Robert Post An analysis of legal frameworks governing speech restrictions and the balance between individual rights and social order.
The Future of Free Speech by Lee Bollinger A comprehensive exploration of free speech principles in relation to modern challenges from technology, politics, and changing cultural norms.
Speech Wars by Dennis Donoghue A study of censorship battles, court cases, and social debates about the boundaries between protected speech and restricted content.
The First Amendment by Daniel Farber The text traces the evolution of First Amendment interpretations through Supreme Court decisions and changing social standards.
Censorship and Silencing by Robert Post An analysis of legal frameworks governing speech restrictions and the balance between individual rights and social order.
The Future of Free Speech by Lee Bollinger A comprehensive exploration of free speech principles in relation to modern challenges from technology, politics, and changing cultural norms.
🤔 Interesting facts
🔖 Frederick Schauer wrote this influential work in 1976, at a time when obscenity law was rapidly evolving due to several landmark Supreme Court cases.
📚 The book explores the complex relationship between the First Amendment and obscenity regulation, including the famous "Miller test" established by Miller v. California (1973).
⚖️ Schauer went on to become one of America's leading First Amendment scholars and a professor at Harvard Law School and the University of Virginia School of Law.
📋 The work remains one of the most comprehensive examinations of how courts have struggled to define "obscenity" while balancing free speech rights with community standards.
🗯️ The book addresses the philosophical paradox of protecting speech in general while excluding obscenity from First Amendment protection - a tension that continues to challenge courts today in the digital age.