Book

Almog, Perry, and Wettstein

📖 Overview

David Kaplan's collection "Themes from Kaplan" was published in 1989 by Oxford University Press. The book contains twenty essays from leading philosophers examining Kaplan's work on demonstratives, indexicals, proper names, and related topics in the philosophy of language. The essays engage with Kaplan's theories about direct reference and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. These contributions represent key responses to Kaplan's influential papers "Demonstratives" and "On Demonstratives," while also developing new perspectives on deixis, context-dependence, and linguistic meaning. The volume includes responses from John Perry, Howard Wettstein, Joseph Almog and other major figures in philosophy of language and formal semantics. Kaplan himself provides replies to several of the essays, advancing the debate on these fundamental questions. This book stands as a core text in the development of direct reference theory and the analysis of indexical expressions in natural language. The collection reveals the deep connections between semantic theory and broader questions about mind, meaning, and the nature of linguistic communication.

👀 Reviews

There are not enough internet reviews to create a summary of this book. Instead, here is a summary of reviews of David Kaplan's overall work: Readers across academic and philosophical forums respect Kaplan's technical precision and his impact on formal semantics. His papers receive attention primarily from philosophy students, professors, and researchers. Readers appreciated: - Clear explanations of complex concepts in "Demonstratives" - Formal rigor in analyses of indexicals and direct reference - Useful examples that illuminate abstract ideas - Historical scholarship on Frege and other logicians Common criticisms: - Dense, technical writing style makes works inaccessible to beginners - Limited availability of some key papers outside academic institutions - Lack of practical applications or real-world examples On Goodreads and PhilPapers, Kaplan's works receive frequent citations but few public reviews due to their specialized academic nature. His papers appear frequently on philosophy course syllabi and reading lists. Academic citation indexes show high impact factors for "Demonstratives" and his work on direct reference theory. Online philosophy forums like r/askphilosophy regularly recommend Kaplan's papers for advanced study of formal semantics and philosophy of language.

📚 Similar books

Demonstratives by Stephen Neale This text expands on Kaplan's theories about indexicals and reference while presenting new frameworks for understanding demonstrative expressions.

The Philosophy of Language by Scott Soames The work provides detailed analysis of direct reference theory and rigid designation, building upon concepts central to Kaplan's semantic framework.

Reference and Existence by Saul Kripke These lectures examine the relationship between naming and necessity, complementing Kaplan's work on direct reference and demonstratives.

Context and Content by Robert C. Stalnaker This collection explores the intersection of semantics and pragmatics, developing themes found in Kaplan's analysis of context-dependent expressions.

On Reference by Andrea Bianchi The text examines contemporary debates in the theory of reference, incorporating and critiquing Kaplan's contributions to direct reference theory.

🤔 Interesting facts

🔹 David Kaplan's work on demonstratives and indexicals revolutionized how philosophers understand context-dependent expressions, introducing the influential distinction between "character" and "content." 🔹 The book explores the concept of "direct reference," challenging traditional Fregean theories of meaning and influencing decades of subsequent work in philosophy of language. 🔹 Kaplan developed the formal semantic system "LD" (Logic of Demonstratives), which became a foundational tool for analyzing the logic of indexicals like "I," "here," and "now." 🔹 The collection includes Kaplan's famous "Dthat" paper, which introduced a new operator for turning descriptions into directly referential terms, sparking ongoing debates about rigid designation. 🔹 The ideas presented in this volume helped bridge the gap between formal logic and natural language semantics, influencing both philosophical and linguistic approaches to meaning.