For Lust of Knowing

For Lust of Knowing traces the evolution of Western academic study of the Orient through detailed histories of British, French, and German scholars. The text maps out the distinct approaches and research methodologies that shaped this field from its origins to modern times. The book serves as a direct response to Edward Said's influential work Orientalism, challenging his central arguments with historical evidence and scholarly analysis. Irwin examines the academic discipline of Orientalism on its own terms, focusing on scholarly texts and academic works rather than artistic or literary representations. Through systematic examination of major Orientalist figures and institutions, Irwin presents a counter-narrative to modern critiques of the field. The text establishes the scholarly traditions, academic rigor, and research contributions that characterized Western study of Eastern cultures and societies. This work raises fundamental questions about how academic disciplines develop, how knowledge is constructed across cultural boundaries, and the relationship between scholarship and political power. It contributes to ongoing debates about cultural interpretation and the nature of academic inquiry.

Readers view this as a critical response to Edward Said's "Orientalism," with most appreciating Irwin's detailed examination of Oriental scholarship history. Readers highlighted: - Clear breakdown of Islamic studies development - Strong research and documentation - Balance between academic rigor and readability - Effective countering of Said's arguments with historical evidence Common criticisms: - Dense academic writing style - Too focused on British/French Oriental scholars - Some sections feel repetitive - Limited coverage of non-European perspectives Ratings: Goodreads: 3.9/5 (87 ratings) Amazon: 4.1/5 (12 ratings) One reader noted: "Irwin provides needed historical context Said overlooked." Another commented: "The writing gets bogged down in academic minutiae." Several reviewers mentioned the book works best for readers already familiar with Said's work and academic discourse around Orientalism, rather than as an introduction to the topic.

Dangerous Knowledge: Orientalism and Its Discontents by Malcolm Kerr Documents the intellectual development of Middle Eastern studies through key historical figures and institutions from the medieval period to modern times.

Empire of Scholars: Universities, Networks and the British Imperial Mind by Tamson Pietsch Explores the networks of academic knowledge production across the British Empire and their role in shaping Oriental studies.

German Orientalism in the Age of Empire by Suzanne L. Marchand Maps the distinct German approach to Oriental studies and its connection to academic institutions from 1800-1918.

The Birth of Orientalism by Urs App Chronicles the emergence of European scholarly interest in Asian religions and philosophies through examination of primary sources and academic archives.

Islamic and European Expansion: The Forging of a Global Order by Michael Adas Details the academic and institutional frameworks through which European scholars interpreted and catalogued Islamic societies during colonial expansion.

🔹 The book's title "For Lust of Knowing" is a direct reference to Rudyard Kipling's poem "The English Flag," reflecting the genuine scholarly passion that drove many Orientalists. 🔹 Robert Irwin served as the Middle East Editor of The Times Literary Supplement for over 20 years and is recognized as one of Britain's leading Middle East scholars. 🔹 The book was published in the UK under a different title: "Dangerous Knowledge: Orientalism and Its Discontents," highlighting regional marketing differences in academic publishing. 🔹 This work represents one of the most comprehensive challenges to Edward Said's 1978 book "Orientalism," which had dominated academic discourse on the subject for nearly three decades. 🔹 The book reveals how many early Orientalist scholars were actually sympathetic to Islamic culture and often defended it against European prejudices, contrary to popular modern assumptions.