The Double Life of Paul de Man

The Double Life of Paul de Man examines the hidden past of a prominent literary scholar who became a leading figure at Yale University in the 1970s. Barish reconstructs de Man's early years in Belgium and later reinvention in America through extensive archival research and interviews. The biography traces de Man's path from his privileged upbringing in Antwerp through his activities during World War II and into his academic career in the United States. Following his arrival in New York in 1948, de Man built a new identity as an influential professor and theorist while keeping his European history concealed. The book reveals previously unknown details about de Man's personal relationships, business dealings, and professional maneuvers as he rose to become a foundational voice in literary criticism. Barish documents how he shaped the field of deconstruction while maintaining strict control over information about his past. This biography raises deeper questions about truth, identity, and the relationship between a scholar's life and work. The parallel narratives of de Man's public and private lives create a complex portrait of reinvention in post-war America.

Readers note the extensive research but question the book's reliability and interpretations. Many reviewers point out factual errors and criticize Barish's tendency to make assumptions about de Man's motivations without evidence. Readers appreciated: - Detailed investigation of de Man's early life in Belgium - Coverage of his wartime activities and journalism - Documentation of his path to academic prominence Common criticisms: - Speculative psychological analysis - Errors in dates and details - Overreliance on unnamed sources - Sensationalistic tone A Yale professor's review called it "character assassination masquerading as biography." Multiple readers noted the book seems driven by a desire to expose de Man rather than understand him. Ratings: Goodreads: 3.3/5 (43 ratings) Amazon: 3.7/5 (31 ratings) Publishers Weekly: Mixed review Times Higher Education: Critical review The most positive reviews come from readers unfamiliar with de Man's work, while academics and those knowledgeable about the subject tend to rate it lower.

The Lives of Jean-Paul Sartre by Annie Cohen-Solal A biography exploring Sartre's complex political shifts and academic deceptions during World War II and his rise in French intellectual circles.

Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil by Rüdiger Safranski This account uncovers Heidegger's Nazi affiliations while examining his philosophical influence and postwar attempts to minimize his political past.

The Case of Wagner by Joachim Köhler The biography traces Wagner's anti-Semitism and political manipulations while documenting his impact on German cultural life.

Günter Grass and the Germans by Michael Jürgs This work reveals how Nobel laureate Grass concealed his Waffen-SS membership while becoming Germany's moral conscience.

Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World by Elisabeth Young-Bruehl The biography examines Arendt's complicated relationship with Heidegger and her evolution from German Jewish intellectual to American political theorist.

🔹 Paul de Man, a prominent literary theorist at Yale, managed to hide his past as a Nazi collaborator who wrote anti-Semitic articles for Belgian newspapers during WWII until four years after his death in 1983. 🔹 Author Evelyn Barish spent over a decade researching de Man's life, uncovering previously unknown details including his multiple marriages and abandonments of families across continents. 🔹 Before becoming an influential academic, de Man ran a publishing house in New York that went bankrupt, leaving authors unpaid and resulting in criminal charges that he managed to evade. 🔹 De Man's theory of "deconstruction" became central to literary criticism in American universities, ironically emphasizing the unreliability of language while he himself lived a life built on deception. 🔹 The revelation of de Man's wartime writings in 1987 created an academic earthquake, forcing scholars to reconsider the relationship between a theorist's personal history and their intellectual contributions.