Killing the White Man's Indian

Killing the White Man's Indian examines the complex relationship between Native Americans and the United States government from the 1960s to the 1990s. The book focuses on key conflicts over tribal sovereignty, gaming rights, land claims, and cultural preservation. Through interviews and on-site reporting, Bordewich documents battles between tribes and federal/state authorities across multiple reservations and regions. The narrative moves between historical context and contemporary accounts of Native communities working to define their place in modern America. A core investigation of the book centers on how both Native Americans and non-Native Americans have struggled with competing visions of tribal identity and rights. Bordewich explores legal cases, political movements, and social changes that shaped federal Indian policy during this period. The work challenges simplistic narratives about Native American history and raises fundamental questions about sovereignty, cultural authenticity, and the future of tribal nations within the American system. These themes echo through debates that continue in the present day.

Readers describe the book as a balanced examination of modern Native American issues that avoids both romanticism and condemnation. Many note its thorough research and accessible writing style. Liked: - Detailed coverage of sovereignty, casinos, and land rights - Clear explanations of complex legal/political history - Inclusion of diverse Native American voices and perspectives - Focus on contemporary challenges rather than just historical events Disliked: - Title choice seen as provocative and potentially offensive - Some sections drag with policy minutiae - A few readers found the tone occasionally patronizing - Limited coverage of certain tribes and regions Ratings: Goodreads: 4.0/5 (187 ratings) Amazon: 4.3/5 (41 ratings) One reader noted: "Finally, a book that looks at Native Americans as real people facing real modern challenges, not museum pieces frozen in time." Another criticized: "The author sometimes oversimplifies complex tribal differences to make broader points."

The Earth is Weeping by Peter Cozzens This history examines the Indian Wars from both Native American and U.S. military perspectives through primary sources and battlefield accounts.

Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee Brown The text documents the systematic destruction of American Indian tribes through firsthand accounts, council records, and autobiographies.

Blood and Thunder by Hampton Sides The narrative traces the conquest of the American West through the lens of Kit Carson's life and his complex relationships with Native American tribes.

Empire of the Summer Moon by S.C. Gwynne The book chronicles the rise and fall of the Comanche tribe through the story of their last chief, Quanah Parker, and his white mother.

The Journey of Crazy Horse by Joseph M. Marshall III This account presents Lakota history through the life of Crazy Horse using oral histories and tribal perspectives.

🔖 Author Fergus Bordewich spent five years traveling across the United States, visiting more than two dozen reservations and interviewing hundreds of Native Americans to research this book. 🏛️ The book's title references the nineteenth-century practice of forced assimilation through boarding schools, where Native American children were made to abandon their cultural identities. 🗓️ Published in 1996, this work was one of the first mainstream books to extensively examine modern Native American sovereignty issues and casino gaming conflicts. 🤝 The author reveals how the Bureau of Indian Affairs historically employed more than 14,000 people but had only 250 Native American employees in the 1950s, despite being tasked with managing Indian affairs. 📚 Bordewich challenges both liberal and conservative stereotypes about Native Americans, examining how oversimplified views of "noble savages" or "casino Indians" harm genuine understanding of contemporary tribal issues.