Book

The Rhetoric of Romanticism

📖 Overview

The Rhetoric of Romanticism compiles Paul de Man's key essays on major Romantic writers and the philosophical underpinnings of Romanticism. The collection focuses on works by Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, and Hölderlin. De Man examines how language and rhetoric function in Romantic texts, challenging traditional interpretations through close textual analysis. His investigations center on the tension between what Romantic texts claim to express and what they actually communicate through their rhetorical structures. The essays trace patterns of figural language and rhetorical devices across different Romantic works, revealing inconsistencies between stated meanings and linguistic realities. De Man's readings demonstrate how Romantic texts often undermine their own claims to emotional or natural authenticity. These collected works present a critical framework for understanding how language shapes meaning in Romantic literature, while exploring broader questions about representation and self-consciousness in writing. The book's analyses suggest that rhetoric and figurative language are not mere ornaments but essential components that determine how texts generate meaning.

👀 Reviews

Readers note this essay collection's complex analysis of Romantic literature, particularly de Man's close readings of Wordsworth, Kleist, and Rousseau. Most reviewers on academic forums highlight the book's influence on literary theory, though many find it unnecessarily dense. Liked: - Detailed textual analysis that reveals new interpretations - Thorough examination of metaphor and rhetoric in Romantic works - Clear connections between language and meaning Disliked: - Dense, difficult writing style that can be hard to follow - Excessive use of specialized terminology - Some arguments seen as overly complex or circular Ratings: Goodreads: 4.02/5 (89 ratings) Amazon: 3.5/5 (6 ratings) "Brilliant but impenetrable at times" notes one Goodreads reviewer. Another writes, "Required careful re-reading of nearly every paragraph." Several academic blog reviews cite the chapter on Wordsworth's Essays on Epitaphs as particularly valuable, while criticizing the overall accessibility of de Man's prose.

📚 Similar books

The Mirror and the Lamp by M. H. Abrams This text traces the transformation from classical to romantic theories of literature through analysis of metaphors and philosophical paradigms.

Allegories of Reading by Paul de Man The text examines the rhetorical nature of language through readings of Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust.

Blindness and Insight by Paul de Man This collection explores the paradoxical relationship between critical insight and theoretical blindness in literary criticism.

The Romantic Ideology by Jerome McGann The work critiques and historicizes romantic poetry and its interpretation through examination of critical traditions and cultural assumptions.

Natural Supernaturalism by M.H. Abrams This study maps the secularization of inherited theological ideas in romantic literature and thought.

🤔 Interesting facts

🔹 Paul de Man's work in The Rhetoric of Romanticism challenged traditional interpretations of Romantic literature by arguing that the language of Romantic texts often undermines their apparent meanings. 🔹 The book was published posthumously in 1984, shortly after de Man's death, and became central to the development of deconstruction theory in literary studies. 🔹 A major revelation about de Man's past emerged after this book's publication: his writing of anti-Semitic articles for a Belgian newspaper during World War II, which sparked intense debate about the relationship between an author's life and their scholarly work. 🔹 The collection includes influential essays on major Romantic figures like Wordsworth and Rousseau, introducing the concept of "prosopopeia" as a key figure of Romantic autobiography. 🔹 De Man wrote many of these essays while at Yale University, where he worked alongside other prominent literary theorists like Jacques Derrida and Geoffrey Hartman, forming what became known as the "Yale School" of criticism.